Thread (34 messages) flat view 34 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] ref-filter: introduce struct used_atom

From: Eric Sunshine <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:07:29

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Karthik Nayak [off-list ref] wrote:
Introduce the 'used_array' structure which would replace the existing
implementation of 'used_array' (which a list of atoms). This helps us
parse atom's before hand and store required details into the
'used_array' for future usage.
All my v1 review comments[1] about the commit message still apply to
this version.

[1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/281860
Also introduce a parsing function for each atom in valid_atom. Using
this we can define special parsing functions for each of the atoms.
This is a conceptually distinct change which probably deserves its own
patch. In particular, the new patch would add this field to
valid_atom[] *and* add the code which invokes the custom parser. (That
code is currently commingled with introduction of the color parser in
patch 6/11.)

More below...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <redacted>
---
diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
@@ -16,9 +16,27 @@
+/*
+ * An atom is a valid field atom listed below, possibly prefixed with
+ * a "*" to denote deref_tag().
+ *
+ * We parse given format string and sort specifiers, and make a list
+ * of properties that we need to extract out of objects.  ref_array_item
+ * structure will hold an array of values extracted that can be
+ * indexed with the "atom number", which is an index into this
+ * array.
+ */
+static struct used_atom {
+       const char *str;
+       cmp_type type;
+} *used_atom;
+static int used_atom_cnt, need_tagged, need_symref;
+static int need_color_reset_at_eol;
+
 static struct {
        const char *name;
        cmp_type cmp_type;
+       void (*parser)(struct used_atom *atom);
 } valid_atom[] = {
        { "refname" },
        { "objecttype" },
@@ -786,7 +788,8 @@ static void populate_value(struct ref_array_item *ref)

        /* Fill in specials first */
        for (i = 0; i < used_atom_cnt; i++) {
-               const char *name = used_atom[i];
+               struct used_atom *atom = &used_atom[i];
+               const char *name = atom->str;
Same question as my previous review[1]: Why not just:

    const char *name = used_atom[i].str;

?
                struct atom_value *v = &ref->value[i];
                int deref = 0;
                const char *refname;
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help