Thread (40 messages) flat view 40 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH/RFC 01/10] ref-filter: introduce a parsing function for each atom in valid_atom

From: Eric Sunshine <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:07:18

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Karthik Nayak [off-list ref] wrote:
Introduce a parsing function for each atom in valid_atom. Using this
we can define special parsing functions for each of the atoms. Since
we have a third field in valid_atom structure, we now fill out missing
cmp_type values.
I don't get it. Why do you need to "fill out missing cmp_type values"
considering that you're never assigning the third field in this patch?
Are you planning on filling in the third field in a future patch?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <redacted>
---
diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
@@ -19,42 +19,43 @@ typedef enum { FIELD_STR, FIELD_ULONG, FIELD_TIME } cmp_type;
 static struct {
        const char *name;
        cmp_type cmp_type;
+       void (*parser)(struct used_atom *atom);
Compiler diagnostic:

    warning: declaration of 'struct used_atom' will not be
        visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility]

Indeed, it seems rather odd to introduce the new field in this patch
but never actually do anything with it. It's difficult to understand
the intention.
 } valid_atom[] = {
-       { "refname" },
-       { "objecttype" },
+       { "refname", FIELD_STR },
+       { "objecttype", FIELD_STR },
        { "objectsize", FIELD_ULONG },
-       { "objectname" },
-       { "tree" },
-       { "parent" },
+       { "objectname", FIELD_STR },
+       { "tree", FIELD_STR },
+       { "parent", FIELD_STR },
        { "numparent", FIELD_ULONG },
-       { "object" },
-       { "type" },
-       { "tag" },
-       { "author" },
-       { "authorname" },
-       { "authoremail" },
+       { "object", FIELD_STR },
+       { "type", FIELD_STR },
+       { "tag", FIELD_STR },
+       { "author", FIELD_STR },
+       { "authorname", FIELD_STR },
+       { "authoremail", FIELD_STR },
        { "authordate", FIELD_TIME },
-       { "committer" },
-       { "committername" },
-       { "committeremail" },
+       { "committer", FIELD_STR },
+       { "committername", FIELD_STR },
+       { "committeremail", FIELD_STR },
        { "committerdate", FIELD_TIME },
-       { "tagger" },
-       { "taggername" },
-       { "taggeremail" },
+       { "tagger", FIELD_STR },
+       { "taggername", FIELD_STR },
+       { "taggeremail", FIELD_STR },
        { "taggerdate", FIELD_TIME },
-       { "creator" },
+       { "creator", FIELD_STR },
        { "creatordate", FIELD_TIME },
-       { "subject" },
-       { "body" },
-       { "contents" },
-       { "upstream" },
-       { "push" },
-       { "symref" },
-       { "flag" },
-       { "HEAD" },
-       { "color" },
-       { "align" },
-       { "end" },
+       { "subject", FIELD_STR },
+       { "body", FIELD_STR },
+       { "contents", FIELD_STR },
+       { "upstream", FIELD_STR },
+       { "push", FIELD_STR },
+       { "symref", FIELD_STR },
+       { "flag", FIELD_STR },
+       { "HEAD", FIELD_STR },
+       { "color", FIELD_STR },
+       { "align", FIELD_STR },
+       { "end", FIELD_STR },
 };

 #define REF_FORMATTING_STATE_INIT  { 0, NULL }
--
2.6.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help