On 07/08/2015 01:18 AM, David Turner wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 18:21 +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
<snip> changes applied; will re-roll.
quoted
quoted
+
+int safe_create_reflog(const char *refname, struct strbuf *err, int force_create)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
+
+ ret = log_ref_setup(refname, &sb, err, force_create);
+ strbuf_release(&sb);
+ return ret;
+}
+
Is it really necessary to have two functions, safe_create_reflog() and
log_ref_setup()? I don't see any of the callers doing anything special
with the sb_logfile argument from the latter, so maybe it could be
inlined into safe_create_reflog()? Maybe I'm overlooking something.
log_ref_write_1 does use the sb_logfile argument.
Thanks for the clarification. I *did* overlook something.
Michael
--
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@alum.mit.edu