On 06/09/2015 06:42 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Michael Haggerty [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
In set notation,
"non-NULL" =
"non-NULL and not NULL_SHA1" ∪
"non-NULL and equal to NULL_SHA1"
The latter two are *not* treated the same, so I don't see how we can
claim that "non-NULL" and "not NULL_SHA1" are treated the same. I must
be misunderstanding you.
Would it help if I changed the comment to
Delete the specified reference. If old_sha1 is non-NULL and not
NULL_SHA1, then verify that the current value of the reference is
old_sha1 before deleting it. If old_sha1 is NULL or NULL_SHA1,
delete the reference it it exists, regardless of its old value.
?
This is very clear to me.
OK, I will make the change in v2 (with s/it it/if it/).
Michael
--
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@alum.mit.edu