Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] t5524: test --log=1 limits shortlog length
From: Johannes Sixt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:04:41
Am 07.05.2015 um 19:06 schrieb Paul Tan:
Hi Dscho, On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi Paul, On 2015-05-07 10:44, Paul Tan wrote:quoted
@@ -32,4 +35,18 @@ test_expect_success pull ' ) ' +test_expect_failure '--log=1 limits shortlog length' ' +( + cd cloned && + git reset --hard HEAD^ && + test `cat afile` = original && + test `cat bfile` = added && + git pull --log && + git log -3 && + git cat-file commit HEAD >result && + grep Dollar result && + ! grep "second commit" result +)I think it might be better to use `test_must_fail` here, just for consistency (the `!` operator would also pass if `grep` itself could not be executed correctly, quite academic, I know, given that `grep` is exercised plenty of times by the test suite, but still...) What do you think?Yep, it's definitely better. Sometimes I forget about the existence of some test utility functions :-/.
Nope, it's not better. test_must_fail is explicitly only for git invocations. We do not expect 'grep' to segfault or something. Cf. eg. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/258725/focus=258752 -- Hannes