Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 7 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] t5524: test --log=1 limits shortlog length

From: Johannes Sixt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:04:41

Am 07.05.2015 um 19:06 schrieb Paul Tan:
Hi Dscho,

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Johannes Schindelin
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Paul,

On 2015-05-07 10:44, Paul Tan wrote:
quoted
@@ -32,4 +35,18 @@ test_expect_success pull '
  )
  '

+test_expect_failure '--log=1 limits shortlog length' '
+(
+     cd cloned &&
+     git reset --hard HEAD^ &&
+     test `cat afile` = original &&
+     test `cat bfile` = added &&
+     git pull --log &&
+     git log -3 &&
+     git cat-file commit HEAD >result &&
+     grep Dollar result &&
+     ! grep "second commit" result
+)
I think it might be better to use `test_must_fail` here, just for
consistency (the `!` operator would also pass if `grep` itself could not
be executed correctly, quite academic, I know, given that `grep` is
exercised plenty of times by the test suite, but still...)

What do you think?
Yep, it's definitely better. Sometimes I forget about the existence of
some test utility functions :-/.
Nope, it's not better. test_must_fail is explicitly only for git invocations. We do not expect 'grep' to segfault or something.

Cf. eg. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/258725/focus=258752

-- Hannes
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help