Hi Paul,
On 2015-05-07 10:44, Paul Tan wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -32,4 +35,18 @@ test_expect_success pull '
)
'
+test_expect_failure '--log=1 limits shortlog length' '
+(
+ cd cloned &&
+ git reset --hard HEAD^ &&
+ test `cat afile` = original &&
+ test `cat bfile` = added &&
+ git pull --log &&
+ git log -3 &&
+ git cat-file commit HEAD >result &&
+ grep Dollar result &&
+ ! grep "second commit" result
+)
I think it might be better to use `test_must_fail` here, just for consistency (the `!` operator would also pass if `grep` itself could not be executed correctly, quite academic, I know, given that `grep` is exercised plenty of times by the test suite, but still...)
What do you think?
Ciao,
Dscho
P.S.: I missed 12/12 but the rest of the patches looked fine to these old eyes. Thanks!