Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 2/3] p7300: added performance tests for clean

From: Torsten Bögershausen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:04:23

On 2015-04-06 13.48, Erik Elfström wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Erik Elfström <redacted>
---
 t/perf/p7300-clean.sh | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 t/perf/p7300-clean.sh
diff --git a/t/perf/p7300-clean.sh b/t/perf/p7300-clean.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..3f56fb2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/perf/p7300-clean.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+test_description="Test git-clean performance"
+
+. ./perf-lib.sh
+
+test_perf_large_repo
+test_checkout_worktree
+
+test_expect_success 'setup untracked directory with many sub dirs' '
+	rm -rf 500_sub_dirs 50000_sub_dirs clean_test_dir &&
+	mkdir 500_sub_dirs 50000_sub_dirs clean_test_dir &&
+	for i in $(seq 1 500)
I think "seq" is bash-only, and can be easily replaced by "test_seq" 
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+	do
+		mkdir 500_sub_dirs/dir$i
+	done &&
+	for i in $(seq 1 100)
+	do
+		cp -r 500_sub_dirs 50000_sub_dirs/dir$i
+	done
+'
+
+test_perf 'clean many untracked sub dirs, check for nested git' '
+	rm -rf clean_test_dir/50000_sub_dirs_cpy &&
+	cp -r 50000_sub_dirs clean_test_dir/50000_sub_dirs_cpy &&
+	git clean -q -f -d  clean_test_dir/ &&
+	test 0 = $(ls -A clean_test_dir/ | wc -l)
Is the "ls -A" portable on all systems:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/ls.html

My feeling is that the "emptiness" of a directory can by tested by simply removing it:
+	git clean -q -f -d  clean_test_dir/ &&
+	rmdir clean_test_dir
(And similar below)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help