Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Add target to build PDF manpages
From: Philip Oakley <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:04:16
From: "Michael J Gruber" <redacted>
Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 20.03.2015 23:38:quoted
Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Thomas referencing reading the man page offline, made me wonder why you wouldn't read the man pages itself as they can also be carried around offline. But the striking point is "on an iPad", which doesn't offer you the convenience of a shell etc, but pdf is fine to read there. Also you can add comments to pdfs more easily that html pages I'd guess. So the patch makes sense to me now. It's just a use case I'm personally not interested in for now, but I don't oppose it as is.Well, my comment was not about opposing to it, but was about questioning the usefulness of it, iow, who would benefit from having this patch in my tree? I didn't see (and I still do not quite see) why people would want to have separate pdf files for all the subcommands (instead of say an .epub or .pdf that binds all the man pages and perhaps user-manual, just like we do for .texi/.info).Exactly. For PDF, a combined document is more natural and will hopefully make crosslinks work as crossrefs within one document, rather than links to external documents. I'd say that would make a valuable target.
As per the original request, it is useful to some, and the usefulness of a very large pdf containing all the documentation shouldn't be a reason to not have such a 'one at a time' target available (though personally I would suggest that it is the users responsibility to 'make' such a target, not the maintainers!). The single large pdf has also been discussed (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/207151/focus=207165) but didn't get into the code base either. The user-manual is available as a pdf target. Philip