Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:
Thomas referencing reading the man page offline, made me wonder
why you wouldn't read the man pages itself as they can also be
carried around offline. But the striking point is "on an iPad", which
doesn't offer you the convenience of a shell etc, but pdf is fine to read
there. Also you can add comments to pdfs more easily that html pages
I'd guess.
So the patch makes sense to me now. It's just a use case I'm personally
not interested in for now, but I don't oppose it as is.
Well, my comment was not about opposing to it, but was about
questioning the usefulness of it, iow, who would
benefit from having this patch in my tree?
I didn't see (and I still do not quite see) why people would want to
have separate pdf files for all the subcommands (instead of say an
.epub or .pdf that binds all the man pages and perhaps user-manual,
just like we do for .texi/.info).