Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] run-command: use void to declare that functions take no parameters

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:02:54
Subsystem: the rest · Maintainer: Linus Torvalds

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 02:43:10PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Explicitly declare that git_atexit_dispatch() and git_atexit_clear()
take no parameters instead of leaving their parameter list empty and
thus unspecified.
[...]

I was kind of surprised after running a git blame to find that this
is a recent thing, and the same patch looked quite substandard with
numerious style violations, and I somehow managed to let them slip
in X-<.  Perhaps I was having a bad day or something...
I had always just assumed that -Wstrict-prototypes was part of -Wall,
but it is not (nor even part of -Wextra!). Maybe it is time to add it to
your integration-build flags. :)

Looks like we also need this on top of hv/submodule-config (still in pu,
so squashing is probably best):
diff --git a/submodule-config.h b/submodule-config.h
index 58afc83..9061e4e 100644
--- a/submodule-config.h
+++ b/submodule-config.h
@@ -24,6 +24,6 @@ const struct submodule *submodule_from_name(const unsigned char *commit_sha1,
 		const char *name);
 const struct submodule *submodule_from_path(const unsigned char *commit_sha1,
 		const char *path);
-void submodule_free();
+void submodule_free(void);
 
 #endif /* SUBMODULE_CONFIG_H */

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help