René Scharfe [off-list ref] writes:
Explicitly declare that git_atexit_dispatch() and git_atexit_clear()
take no parameters instead of leaving their parameter list empty and
thus unspecified.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <redacted>
---
Thanks.
I was kind of surprised after running a git blame to find that this
is a recent thing, and the same patch looked quite substandard with
numerious style violations, and I somehow managed to let them slip
in X-<. Perhaps I was having a bad day or something...
quoted hunk
run-command.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/run-command.c b/run-command.c
index 79a0a76..a476999 100644
--- a/run-command.c
+++ b/run-command.c
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ static struct {
static int git_atexit_installed;
-static void git_atexit_dispatch()
+static void git_atexit_dispatch(void)
{
size_t i;
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ static void git_atexit_dispatch()
git_atexit_hdlrs.handlers[i-1]();
}
-static void git_atexit_clear()
+static void git_atexit_clear(void)
{
free(git_atexit_hdlrs.handlers);
memset(&git_atexit_hdlrs, 0, sizeof(git_atexit_hdlrs));