Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] run-command: use void to declare that functions take no parameters

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:02:54

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

René Scharfe [off-list ref] writes:
Explicitly declare that git_atexit_dispatch() and git_atexit_clear()
take no parameters instead of leaving their parameter list empty and
thus unspecified.

Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <redacted>
---
Thanks.

I was kind of surprised after running a git blame to find that this
is a recent thing, and the same patch looked quite substandard with
numerious style violations, and I somehow managed to let them slip
in X-<.  Perhaps I was having a bad day or something...
quoted hunk
 run-command.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/run-command.c b/run-command.c
index 79a0a76..a476999 100644
--- a/run-command.c
+++ b/run-command.c
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ static struct {
 
 static int git_atexit_installed;
 
-static void git_atexit_dispatch()
+static void git_atexit_dispatch(void)
 {
 	size_t i;
 
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ static void git_atexit_dispatch()
 		git_atexit_hdlrs.handlers[i-1]();
 }
 
-static void git_atexit_clear()
+static void git_atexit_clear(void)
 {
 	free(git_atexit_hdlrs.handlers);
 	memset(&git_atexit_hdlrs, 0, sizeof(git_atexit_hdlrs));
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help