Re: [PATCH v7 09/38] lock_file(): always initialize and register lock_file object

Am 01.10.2014 um 12:28 schrieb Michael Haggerty:

The purpose of this patch is to make the state diagram for lock_file
objects simpler and deterministic.

If locking fails, lock_file() sometimes leaves the lock_file object
partly initialized, but sometimes not. It sometimes registers the
object in lock_file_list, but sometimes not. This makes the state
diagram for lock_file objects effectively indeterministic and hard to
reason about. A future patch will also change the filename field into
a strbuf, which needs more involved initialization, so it will become
even more important that the state of a lock_file object is
well-defined after a failed attempt to lock.

The ambiguity doesn't currently have any ill effects, because
lock_file objects cannot be removed from the lock_file_list anyway.
But to make it easier to document and reason about the code, make this
behavior inconsistent: *always* initialize the lock_file object and

s/incon/con/, certainly?

*always* register it in lock_file_list the first time it is used,
regardless of whether an error occurs.

While we're at it, make sure that all of the lock_file fields are
initialized to values appropriate for an unlocked object; the caller
is only responsible for making sure that on_list is set to zero before
the first time it is used.