It was previously a bug to call commit_lock_file() with a lock_file
object that was not active (an illegal access would happen within the
function). It was presumably never done, but this would be an easy
programming error to overlook. So before continuing, do a consistency
check that the lock_file object really is locked.
Helped-by: Johannes Sixt [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <redacted>
---
Documentation/technical/api-lockfile.txt | 3 ++-
lockfile.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-lockfile.txt b/Documentation/technical/api-lockfile.txt
index 99830f3..6538610 100644
--- a/Documentation/technical/api-lockfile.txt
+++ b/Documentation/technical/api-lockfile.txt
@@ -147,7 +147,8 @@ commit_lock_file::
`hold_lock_file_for_append`, close the file descriptor and
rename the lockfile to its final destination. Return 0 upon
success or a negative value on failure to `close(2)` or
- `rename(2)`.
+ `rename(2)`. It is a bug to call `commit_lock_file()` for a
+ `lock_file` object that is not currently locked.
rollback_lock_file::
diff --git a/lockfile.c b/lockfile.c
index e148227..c897dd8 100644
--- a/lockfile.c
+++ b/lockfile.c
@@ -301,6 +301,9 @@ int commit_lock_file(struct lock_file *lk)
{
char result_file[PATH_MAX];
+ if (!lk->filename[0])
+ die("BUG: attempt to commit unlocked object");
+
if (close_lock_file(lk))
return -1;
--
2.1.0