Re: [PATCH v20 27/48] sequencer.c: use ref transactions for all ref updates
From: Ronnie Sahlberg <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:01:55
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Michael Haggerty [off-list ref] wrote:
On 06/20/2014 04:43 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:quoted
Change to use ref transactions for all updates to refs. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <redacted> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <redacted> --- sequencer.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c index 0a80c58..fd8acaf 100644 --- a/sequencer.c +++ b/sequencer.c@@ -272,23 +272,31 @@ static int error_dirty_index(struct replay_opts *opts) static int fast_forward_to(const unsigned char *to, const unsigned char *from, int unborn, struct replay_opts *opts) { - struct ref_lock *ref_lock; + struct ref_transaction *transaction; struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT; - int ret; + struct strbuf err = STRBUF_INIT; read_cache(); if (checkout_fast_forward(from, to, 1)) exit(1); /* the callee should have complained already */ - ref_lock = lock_any_ref_for_update("HEAD", unborn ? null_sha1 : from, - 0, NULL); - if (!ref_lock) - return error(_("Failed to lock HEAD during fast_forward_to"));I think you've changed the semantics when unborn is set. Please note that lock_any_ref_for_update() behaves differently if old_sha1 is NULL (when no check is done) vs. when it is null_sha1 (when it verifies that the reference didn't previously exist). So when unborn is true, the old code verifies that the reference previously didn't exist...quoted
strbuf_addf(&sb, "%s: fast-forward", action_name(opts)); - ret = write_ref_sha1(ref_lock, to, sb.buf); + + transaction = ref_transaction_begin(&err); + if (!transaction || + ref_transaction_update(transaction, "HEAD", to, from, + 0, !unborn, &err) ||...whereas when unborn is true, the new code does no check at all. I think you want ref_transaction_update(transaction, "HEAD", to, unborn ? null_sha1 : from, 0, 1, &err) ||
Right. Fixed. Thanks.