Re: [GUILT 07/28] Added test cases for "guilt fold".
From: Jeff Sipek <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:01:03
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:59:56PM +0200, Per Cederqvist wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Jeff Sipek [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 08:31:45AM +0100, Per Cederqvist wrote:quoted
Test that we can combine any combination of patches with empty and non-empty messages, both with and without guilt.diffstat. (All patches are empty.)I feel like we should have *some* content there - most of the time, I care more about the diffs getting folded than the commit message :)I added these tests for a reason: the reproduce a bug in guilt that I found. I'm afraid that having some content might hide the bug I found. (I'm also equally afraid that it might uncover other bugs in guilt, which would delay integration of this patch series. So adding more test cases with content is a good thing to do, but maybe not in this patch series.)
Fair enough. I use guilt-fold all the time and it hasn't lost any of my diffs, so I'm happy to defer this until some point in the future. ...
quoted
for using_diffstat in true false ; do for patcha in empty nonempty ; do for patchb in empty nonempty ; do echo "%% $patcha + $patchb (diffstat=$using_diffstat)" ${patcha}_patch $patcha ${patchb}_patch $patchb cmd guilt pop $patchb cmd guilt fold $patchb fixup_time_info $patcha cmd list_files cleanup $patcha cmd list_files done done done Aha! That's better, IMO.I'll try that and post a version 2 of the series. It might take a few days, though.
No problem. I'm still the slower one of the two of us. :/ Jeff. -- Keyboard not found! Press F1 to enter Setup