On 04/29/2014 08:58 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Michael Haggerty [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
[...]
Unless we want to make ref_transaction objects reusable. [...]
ACK, but I don't think we need reusable transaction yet. Once the API
is cleaned up
it should be reasonably easy to add in the future if we see a need for it.
Sounds reasonable to you ?
Yes, reusable transaction objects would be pretty straightforward to
retrofit, so I agree that there is no need to implement it now.
Michael
--
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/