Thread (47 messages) flat view 47 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v3 04/19] refs.c: return error string from ref_update_reject_duplicates on failure

From: Ronnie Sahlberg <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:00:53

Thanks.

Replaced with strbuf_addf() instead.

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] wrote:
Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
quoted
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -3393,6 +3393,7 @@ static int ref_update_compare(const void *r1, const void *r2)
 }

 static int ref_update_reject_duplicates(struct ref_update **updates, int n,
+                                     char **err,
                                      enum action_on_err onerr)
 {
      int i;
@@ -3400,6 +3401,11 @@ static int ref_update_reject_duplicates(struct ref_update **updates, int n,
              if (!strcmp(updates[i - 1]->refname, updates[i]->refname)) {
                      const char *str =
                              "Multiple updates for ref '%s' not allowed.";
+                     if (err) {
+                             *err = xmalloc(PATH_MAX + 41);
+                             snprintf(*err, PATH_MAX + 41, str,
+                                      updates[i]->refname);
+                     }
Same issues as the previous patch: it's too easy to get the buffer size
wrong when updating the message (or, worse, when making it
translatable).  aprintf or a strbuf should work better.

Otherwise seems sensible.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help