Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] git-rebase: fix probable reflog typo

From: Matthieu Moy <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:00:48

Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] writes:
Matthieu Moy wrote:
quoted
Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Commit 26cd160 (rebase -i: use a better reflog message) tried to produce
a better reflog message, however, it seems a statement was introduced by
mistake.

'comment_for_reflog start' basically overides the GIT_REFLOG_ACTION we
just set.
quoted
So, one needs to reset $GIT_REFLOG_ACTION to what it used to be if is it
to be used later. However, it seems to me that the "comment_for_reflog
start" is used only for this checkout command. If so, there's no need
for the "comment_for_reflog start" before the if statement either.
Exactly. But if this variable is only meant for this command, it should be
`VAR=VAL command`, that would make it clear without the need of a comment.
I don't understand. Are you suggesting to replace the shell function
"output" with an external command? If not, which command would you want
to call here?

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help