Re: Make the git codebase thread-safe
From: Zachary Turner <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:59:54
To elaborate a little bit more, you can verify with a sample program that ReadFile with OVERLAPPED does in fact modify the HANDLE's file position. The documentation doesn't actually state one way or another. My original attempt at a patch didn't have the ReOpenFile, and we experienced regular read corruption. We scratched our heads over it for a bit, and then hypothesized that someone must be mixing read styles, which led to this ReOpenFile workaround, which incidentally also solved the corruption problems. We wrote a similar sample program to verify that when using ReOpenHandle, and changing the file pointer of the duplicated handle, that the file pointer of the original handle is not modified. We did not actually try to identify the source of the mixed read styles, but it seems like the only possible explanation. On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Stefan Zager [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Karsten Blees [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Am 13.02.2014 19:38, schrieb Zachary Turner:quoted
The only reason ReOpenFile is necessary at all is because some code somewhere is mixing read-styles against the same fd.I don't understand...ReadFile with OVERLAPPED parameter doesn't modify the HANDLE's file position, so you should be able to mix read()/pread() however you like (as long as read() is only called from one thread).That is, apparently, a bald-faced lie in the ReadFile API doc. First implementation didn't use ReOpenFile, and it crashed all over the place. ReOpenFile fixed it. Stefan