Junio C Hamano wrote:
You seem to be calling it "incorrect" to give the same degree of
completion for a branch the user named "autosetupmerge" as another
branch "topic", but I think it is incorrect not to, so I cannot tell
if we are agreeing or disagreeing.
No, what's incorrect is providing completions for
$ git config branch.autosetupmerge.<TAB>
when no branch called "autosetupmerge" exists. The purpose of the hunk
(which I now removed) was to prevent such completions, but it has the
side-effect of also preventing a legitimate completion in the case
when the user really has a branch named "autosetupmerge".
What is your take on the issue?