Re: [PATCH 3/4] completion: fix branch.autosetup(merge|rebase)

Ramkumar Ramachandra [off-list ref] writes:

Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

If we are looking at "branch.autosetupmerge." followed by something,
who typed that final dot?

I admit that it's a very unlikely case. The user did:

  $ branch.autosetupmer<TAB>

hit backspace to delete the trailing space, inserted a dot, and hit <TAB> again.

quoted

If you are working on a topic about
auto-setup-merge and named your branch "autosetupmerge", don't you
want to be able to configure various aspect of that branch via
branch.autosetupmerge.{remote,merge} etc., just like you can do so
for your "topic" branch via branch.topic.{remote,merge} etc.,
regardless of your use of "autosetupmerge" option across branches?

My reasoning was that being correct was more important that being
complete. So, if by some horrible chance, the user names her branch
"autosetupmerge", we don't aid her in completions.

quoted

Besides, it smells fishy to me that you need to enumerate and
special case these two here, and then you have to repeat them below
in a separate case arm.

I'm not too irked about correctness in this odd case; seeing that you
aren't either, I'll resubmit the series without this hunk (+ the hunk
in remote.pushdefault).

You seem to be calling it "incorrect" to give the same degree of
completion for a branch the user named "autosetupmerge" as another
branch "topic", but I think it is incorrect not to, so I cannot tell
if we are agreeing or disagreeing.

Puzzled...