Matthieu Moy wrote:
Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Matthieu Moy wrote:
quoted
quoted
All options that trigger a patch output now override --no-patch.
The case of --binary is particular as the name may suggest that it turns
Usage nit: this should say "is unusual"
I don't get it. The point is not that --binary is unusual, but that it
is a particular case that deserves extra attention.
Ah, so you mean: "The case of --binary deserves extra attention
because ...".
"is particular" would be an unusual expression, meaning something like
"is made of particles". It's a weird case in English usage where a
word commonly appears attached to a noun ("This particular case") but
cannot be used as the RHS of "is" ("This case is particular").
[...]quoted
A couple of other test ideas:
- "git diff-files --patch --no-patch"
- "git diff-files -s --patch-with-stat"
I'd rather avoid having a too long list here, or we'll end-up testing
all combinations of options ...
Sure. The point of "--patch --no-patch" is to test that ordering is
respected. The point of "--no-patch --patch-with-stat" is so we
remember that there are options other than --patch that should
override --no-patch, for example if this code is ever converted to
parse_options some day.
I'll send a reroll tomorrow.
Thanks for the quick and thoughtful work.