Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:
Matthieu Moy wrote:
quoted
All options that trigger a patch output now override --no-patch.
The case of --binary is particular as the name may suggest that it turns
Usage nit: this should say "is unusual"
I don't get it. The point is not that --binary is unusual, but that it
is a particular case that deserves extra attention.
or "In the case of --binary in particular, the name may suggest ...".
Not really. I'd use "in particular" if --binary was a sub-case of the
others, but here I'm precisely saying that it may not be.
quoted
--- a/t/t4000-diff-format.sh
+++ b/t/t4000-diff-format.sh
@@ -71,4 +71,9 @@ test_expect_success 'git diff-files --no-patch as synonym for -s' '
test_must_be_empty err
'
+test_expect_success 'git diff-files --no-patch --patch shows the patch' '
+ git diff-files --no-patch --patch >diff-np-output 2>err &&
+ compare_diff_patch expected actual
Shouldn't that be "compare_diff_patch expected diff-np-output"?
Oops, right.
A couple of other test ideas:
- "git diff-files --patch --no-patch"
- "git diff-files -s --patch-with-stat"
I'd rather avoid having a too long list here, or we'll end-up testing
all combinations of options ...
I'll send a reroll tomorrow.
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/