Re: [PATCH] t0005: skip signal death exit code test on Windows

Am 6/9/2013 22:31, schrieb Junio C Hamano:

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

I'm a little negative on handling just SIGTERM. That would make the test
pass, but does it really address the overall issue? To me, the
usefulness is having exit values with consistent meanings.

Yes.  Unless the goal is to give Windows port pratically the same
signal semantics as ports on other platforms, I do not think special
casing SIGTERM (unless it is a very common signal on Windows and
others are unlikely to be useful) buys us much.

I'm thinking the same. And, no, SIGTERM is not very common on Windows.

-- Hannes