Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move sequencer

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
[off-list ref] wrote:

Felipe Contreras wrote:

quoted

 sequencer.c => builtin/sequencer.c | 160 +-----------------------------------
 sequencer.h => builtin/sequencer.h |   4 -

Why exactly?  The plan was to unify continuation semantics, and get
all the continuation-commands to use the sequencer.  That clearly
hasn't materialized, but I don't know what this move buys us.

So? The sequencer is only used by builtin commands, and other
continuation commands are also builtins.

The sequencer needs to access methods from builtins/*.o, so unless you
propose that libgit.a includes all the objects in builtins/*.o, this
is the way to go.

-- 
Felipe Contreras