Thread (61 messages) 61 messages, 6 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] add tests for rebasing root

flat view

From: Martin von Zweigbergk <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:57:30

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] wrote:
Am 5/29/2013 8:39, schrieb Martin von Zweigbergk:
quoted
+test_run_rebase () {
+     result=$1
+     shift
+     test_expect_$result "rebase $* --onto --root with merge-base does not go to root" "
+             reset_rebase &&
+             git rebase $* --onto m --root g &&
+             test_cmp_rev m HEAD~2 &&
+             test_linear_range 'c g' m..
Here you check the outcome. There is no explicit check whether the rebase
attempted to replay a and b. But that check is implicit: If a or b were
attempted to replay, the rebase would have been interrupted with "no new
changes". Right?
Because 'm' is a reverted 'b', I think if it had gone to the root, we
would have seen 'b m c g' (I _think_ 'a' would be silently skipped at
least in am mode).
quoted
+test_run_rebase failure -p
Just curious: Does the last one fail because the result is not correct or
because it does go to the root?
Because the result is not correct; it first checks out 'm', but
something goes wrong (maybe because 'm' gets written to
/rewritten/root?) and it somehow fast-forwards to 'c' (from 'b'?).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help