Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] add tests for rebasing root
flat view
From: Martin von Zweigbergk <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:57:30
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] wrote:
Am 5/29/2013 8:39, schrieb Martin von Zweigbergk:quoted
+test_run_rebase () { + result=$1 + shift + test_expect_$result "rebase $* --onto --root with merge-base does not go to root" " + reset_rebase && + git rebase $* --onto m --root g && + test_cmp_rev m HEAD~2 && + test_linear_range 'c g' m..Here you check the outcome. There is no explicit check whether the rebase attempted to replay a and b. But that check is implicit: If a or b were attempted to replay, the rebase would have been interrupted with "no new changes". Right?
Because 'm' is a reverted 'b', I think if it had gone to the root, we would have seen 'b m c g' (I _think_ 'a' would be silently skipped at least in am mode).
quoted
+test_run_rebase failure -pJust curious: Does the last one fail because the result is not correct or because it does go to the root?
Because the result is not correct; it first checks out 'm', but something goes wrong (maybe because 'm' gets written to /rewritten/root?) and it somehow fast-forwards to 'c' (from 'b'?).