Am 5/29/2013 8:39, schrieb Martin von Zweigbergk:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+test_run_rebase () {
+ result=$1
+ shift
+ test_expect_$result "rebase $* --onto --root with merge-base does not go to root" "
+ reset_rebase &&
+ git rebase $* --onto m --root g &&
+ test_cmp_rev m HEAD~2 &&
+ test_linear_range 'c g' m..
Here you check the outcome. There is no explicit check whether the rebase
attempted to replay a and b. But that check is implicit: If a or b were
attempted to replay, the rebase would have been interrupted with "no new
changes". Right?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ "
+}
+
+test_run_rebase success ''
+test_run_rebase success -m
+test_run_rebase success -i
+test_run_rebase failure -p
Just curious: Does the last one fail because the result is not correct or
because it does go to the root?
-- Hannes