Re: [PATCH 1/2] sequencer: trivial fix

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Joachim Schmitz
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: Felipe Contreras [mailto:felipe.contreras@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 12:52 PM
To: Joachim Schmitz
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sequencer: trivial fix

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Joachim Schmitz
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Felipe Contreras wrote:

quoted

Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

It probably is better to fold this patch into the other one when it
is rerolled to correct the option name gotcha "on the tin".

Why? This patch is standalone and fixes an issue that is independent
of the other patch. Why squash two patches that do *two* different
things?

Anyway, I'll happily drop this patch if you want this memory leak to
remain. But then I'll do the same in the other patch.

This mantra of avodiing 'goto' is not helping anybody.

adding 5 letters (to change the next "if" into an "else if") versus your
addition of several lines and some 15 additional letters (ignoring the
whitsspace)  is IMHO enough to see what is better?

This has nothing to do with what Junio said.

Well, it has, but you had snipped it. But replied to the goto issue regardless

I didn't snip anything, this is a different context.

quoted

This is better done without "goto" in general.

He din't say:

__
It probably is better to fold this patch into the other one when it
is rerolled to correct the option name gotcha "on the tin", AND you
fix the goto issue.
__

You added that last part in your mind. Moreover, he didn't say goto
was an issue, he simply stated an opinion about some generality.

-- 
Felipe Contreras