On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
[off-list ref] wrote:
Duy Nguyen wrote:
quoted
Exactly. I already explained why %(upstream) can't be used in 00/09.
"tracking" may not be perfect. Somebody might want
"tracking:upstream:short". It does not look quite nice.
Which is why I suggested keeping upstream, upstream:short, and
introducing upstream:diff and upstream:shortdiff (or :tracking if you
prefer that) in [0/9].
Yeah, but there won't be any upstream in %(tracking). Besides, if we
manage to get downstream, we could do %(tracking:downstream). I think
%(tracking) and %(short:tracking) make sense.
--
Felipe Contreras