Re: [PATCH 3/9] for-each-ref: avoid printing each element directly to stdout

On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

[PATCH 3/9] for-each-ref: avoid printing each element directly to stdout

Why did you do this?  Atoms are designed to be independent of each
other.  I'll keep reading: might find out in a later patch.

Sorry for the lack of explanation in the message. I wanted to discuss
about syntax more than code. As you see later down the series, we'll
need to process an atom for all refs, then output all refs in the end.
We can't do that wihout buffering.
--
Duy