Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] sha1_name: improvements
From: Felipe Contreras <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:57:10
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] wrote:
While trying to add support for the @ shortcut lots of cleanups arised. Here
they are in a single series.
Felipe Contreras (7):
tests: at-combinations: simplify setup
tests: at-combinations: check ref names directly
tests: at-combinations: improve nonsense()
sha1_name: remove no-op
sha1_name: remove unnecessary braces
sha1_name: avoid Yoda conditions
sha1_name: reorganize get_sha1_basic()
Ramkumar Ramachandra (4):
tests: at-combinations: increase coverage
tests: at-combinations: @{N} versus HEAD@{N}
sha1_name: don't waste cycles in the @-parsing loop
sha1_name: check @{-N} errors sooner
When merging this series to the @ shortcut one, there will be
conflicts, this is how I propose fixing them:
return len; /* syntax Ok, not enough switches */
- if (0 < len && len == namelen)
+ if (len > 0 && len == namelen)
return len; /* consumed all */
- else if (0 < len)
...
++ else if (len > 0)
+ return reinterpret(name, namelen, len, buf);
- check "@" new-two
- check "@@{u}" upstream-two
...
++check "@" ref refs/heads/new-branch
++check "@@{u}" ref refs/heads/upstream-branch
If that creates some kind of problem I would rather throw away this
series rather than the other one.
Cheers.
--
Felipe Contreras