Re: [PATCH 2/4] transport-helper: check if remote helper is alive
From: Felipe Contreras <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:56:36
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:51:20PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:quoted
quoted
So in fetch_with_import, we have a remote-helper, and we have a bidirectional pipe to it. We then call get_importer, which starts fast-import, whose stdin is connected to the stdout of the remote helper. We tell the remote-helper to run the import, then we wait for fast-import to finish (and complain if it fails). Then what? We seem to do some more work, which I think is what causes the errors you see; but should we instead be reaping the helper at this point unconditionally? Its stdout has presumably been flushed out to fast-import; is there anything else for us to get from it besides its exit code?The problem is not with import, since fast-import would generally wait properly for a 'done' status, the problem is with export.Your patch modified fetch_with_import. Are you saying that it isn't necessary to do so?It's not, I added it for symmetry. But that's the case *if* the remote-helper is properly using the "done" feature.
Actually, it is a problem, because without this check the transport-helper just goes on without realizing the whole thing has failed and doesn't produce a proper error message: fatal: bad object 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 error: testgit::/home/felipec/dev/git/t/trash directory.t5801-remote-helpers/server did not send all necessary objects It's possible to send a ping command to the remote-helper, but doing so triggers a SIGPIPE. I would rather show a proper error message as my patch suggests by just checking if the command is running.
quoted
quoted
Also, the design is such that the remote-helper stays alive, even after fast-export has finished.So if we expect to be able to communicate with the remote-helper after fast-export has exited, is it a protocol failure that the helper does not say "yes, I finished the export" or similar? If so, can we fix that? I am not too familiar with this protocol, but it looks like we read from helper->out right after closing the exporter, to get the ref statuses. Shouldn't we be detecting the error if the helper hangs up there?I guess that should be possible, I'll give that a try.
I gave this a try and it does work, but it seems rather convoluted to me:
diff --git a/transport-helper.c b/transport-helper.c
index f0d28aa..10b7842 100644
--- a/transport-helper.c
+++ b/transport-helper.c@@ -25,7 +25,8 @@ struct helper_data { option : 1, push : 1, connect : 1, - no_disconnect_req : 1; + no_disconnect_req : 1, + done_export : 1; char *export_marks; char *import_marks; /* These go from remote name (as in "list") to private name */
@@ -46,7 +47,7 @@ static void sendline(struct helper_data *helper,struct strbuf *buffer)
die_errno("Full write to remote helper failed");
}
-static int recvline_fh(FILE *helper, struct strbuf *buffer)
+static int recvline_fh(FILE *helper, struct strbuf *buffer, int safe)
{
strbuf_reset(buffer);
if (debug)@@ -54,7 +55,10 @@ static int recvline_fh(FILE *helper, struct strbuf *buffer) if (strbuf_getline(buffer, helper, '\n') == EOF) { if (debug) fprintf(stderr, "Debug: Remote helper quit.\n"); - exit(128); + if (safe) + return -1; + else + exit(128); } if (debug)
@@ -64,7 +68,12 @@ static int recvline_fh(FILE *helper, struct strbuf *buffer) static int recvline(struct helper_data *helper, struct strbuf *buffer) { - return recvline_fh(helper->out, buffer); + return recvline_fh(helper->out, buffer, 0); +} + +static int recvline_safe(struct helper_data *helper, struct strbuf *buffer) +{ + return recvline_fh(helper->out, buffer, 1); } static void xchgline(struct helper_data *helper, struct strbuf *buffer)
@@ -201,6 +210,8 @@ static struct child_process *get_helper(structtransport *transport)
strbuf_addstr(&arg, "--import-marks=");
strbuf_addstr(&arg, capname + strlen("import-marks "));
data->import_marks = strbuf_detach(&arg, NULL);
+ } else if (!strcmp(capname, "done-export")) {
+ data->done_export = 1;
} else if (mandatory) {
die("Unknown mandatory capability %s. This remote "
"helper probably needs newer version of Git.",@@ -540,7 +551,7 @@ static int process_connect_service(structtransport *transport,
goto exit;
sendline(data, &cmdbuf);
- recvline_fh(input, &cmdbuf);
+ recvline_fh(input, &cmdbuf, 0);
if (!strcmp(cmdbuf.buf, "")) {
data->no_disconnect_req = 1;
if (debug)@@ -704,19 +715,30 @@ static void push_update_ref_status(struct strbuf *buf, (*ref)->remote_status = msg; } -static void push_update_refs_status(struct helper_data *data, +static int push_update_refs_status(struct helper_data *data, struct ref *remote_refs) { struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT; struct ref *ref = remote_refs; + int done = 0; + for (;;) { - recvline(data, &buf); - if (!buf.len) + if (recvline_safe(data, &buf) || !buf.len) + break; + + if (!strncmp(buf.buf, "done", 4)) { + done = 1; break; + } push_update_ref_status(&buf, &ref, remote_refs); } strbuf_release(&buf); + + if (!data->done_export) + return 0; + + return !done; } static int push_refs_with_push(struct transport *transport,
@@ -776,8 +798,7 @@ static int push_refs_with_push(struct transport *transport, sendline(data, &buf); strbuf_release(&buf); - push_update_refs_status(data, remote_refs); - return 0; + return push_update_refs_status(data, remote_refs); } static int push_refs_with_export(struct transport *transport,
@@ -829,8 +850,7 @@ static int push_refs_with_export(struct transport*transport,
if (!check_command(data->helper))
die("Error while running helper");
- push_update_refs_status(data, remote_refs);
- return 0;
+ return push_update_refs_status(data, remote_refs);
}
static int push_refs(struct transport *transport,
--
Felipe Contreras