Re: [PATCH 2/4] transport-helper: check if remote helper is alive
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:56:36
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:51:20PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
quoted
So in fetch_with_import, we have a remote-helper, and we have a bidirectional pipe to it. We then call get_importer, which starts fast-import, whose stdin is connected to the stdout of the remote helper. We tell the remote-helper to run the import, then we wait for fast-import to finish (and complain if it fails). Then what? We seem to do some more work, which I think is what causes the errors you see; but should we instead be reaping the helper at this point unconditionally? Its stdout has presumably been flushed out to fast-import; is there anything else for us to get from it besides its exit code?The problem is not with import, since fast-import would generally wait properly for a 'done' status, the problem is with export.
Your patch modified fetch_with_import. Are you saying that it isn't necessary to do so?
Also, the design is such that the remote-helper stays alive, even after fast-export has finished.
So if we expect to be able to communicate with the remote-helper after fast-export has exited, is it a protocol failure that the helper does not say "yes, I finished the export" or similar? If so, can we fix that? I am not too familiar with this protocol, but it looks like we read from helper->out right after closing the exporter, to get the ref statuses. Shouldn't we be detecting the error if the helper hangs up there? -Peff