Re: [RFC/PATCH] Introduce branch.<name>.pushremote

2013/2/19 Ramkumar Ramachandra:

What is your usecase?  If you have a local branch with the same name
as on the remote, why wouldn't you want to push-to-update it when you
make changes in the branch?  In other words, why doesn't push.default
= matching suffice for most practical purposes.

quoted

... or branch.<name>.pushremote can support some kind of a "none" value?

Not a bad idea at all, provided you tell me your usecase.

The question is infact about branches who are not on the remote.
push.default=matching wouldn't upload the branches which are not there already.
push --all on other hand pushes .. all (as expected :-))...

Its difficult for me to manage quickly, lets say, "news-to-push/*" and
"crazy-ideas/*" branches ...

Blind.