Re: [RFC/PATCH] Introduce branch.<name>.pushremote

Blind wrote:

2013/2/19 Ramkumar Ramachandra:

quoted

No.  I don't see why push.default is limiting.

I just want to find a way to exclude a branch (or infact a group of
branches) from $git push --all.
so when I read your thing, I thought for a second that it could be a
possibility... But seems its not the case.

What is your usecase?  If you have a local branch with the same name
as on the remote, why wouldn't you want to push-to-update it when you
make changes in the branch?  In other words, why doesn't push.default
= matching suffice for most practical purposes.

... or branch.<name>.pushremote can support some kind of a "none" value?

Not a bad idea at all, provided you tell me your usecase.