Re: Support for a series of patches, i.e. patchset or changeset?

Yeah, that's a very clean way I'd always want to follow, yet the
kernel upstream isn't doing so.

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Enrico Weigelt [off-list ref] wrote:

<snip>

yet another idea:

you coud always put your patchsets into separate branches,
rebase them ontop target branch before merging, and then
do an non-ff-merge, which will make the history look like:

* merged origin/feature_foo
|\
| * first preparation fo feature foo
| * part a
| * part b
|/
* merged origin/bugfix_blah
|\
| * fixing bug blah
|/
*


cu
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards

Enrico Weigelt
VNC - Virtual Network Consult GmbH
Head Of Development

Pariser Platz 4a, D-10117 Berlin
Tel.: +49 (30) 3464615-20
Fax: +49 (30) 3464615-59

enrico.weigelt@vnc.biz; www.vnc.de