Re: [PATCH] t1304: improve setfacl prerequisite setup

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

I intentionally did not anchor it because the tests themselves did not,
and I worried that that there was some subtle portability issue there
(especially because of the magic "let there be two colons" part of the
pattern).

OK, fair enough (the "two colons" one I think was for Solaris).