Re: [PATCH] t1304: improve setfacl prerequisite setup

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH] t1304: improve setfacl prerequisite setup

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:54:00

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
I intentionally did not anchor it because the tests themselves did not,
and I worried that that there was some subtle portability issue there
(especially because of the magic "let there be two colons" part of the
pattern).
OK, fair enough (the "two colons" one I think was for Solaris).

Re: [PATCH] t1304: improve setfacl prerequisite setup

From: Brandon Casey <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:54:00

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I intentionally did not anchor it because the tests themselves did not,
and I worried that that there was some subtle portability issue there
(especially because of the magic "let there be two colons" part of the
pattern).
OK, fair enough (the "two colons" one I think was for Solaris).
It was indeed for Solaris.  I don't recall any other differences in
the output between Solaris and Linux, so you could add the anchor and
see if anyone makes noise.  I no longer have access to Solaris to
test.

-Brandon
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help