Re: [PATCHv2] tag: add --points-at list option
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:01
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 11:02:28AM -0800, Tom Grennan wrote:
quoted
Would using sha1_array save us from having to create our own data structure? As a bonus, it can do O(lg n) lookups, though I seriously doubt anyone will provide a large number of "--points-at".Thanks, but I now realize that I also need to save the pointed at refname to detect lightweight tags that have matching sha's but different names.
I'm not sure I understand. Wouldn't you match lightweight tags by the
sha1 they point at? Something like:
static int tag_points_at(struct sha1_array *sa,
const unsigned char *sha1)
{
struct object *obj;
/* Lightweight tag of an interesting sha1? */
if (sha1_array_lookup(sa, sha1) >= 0)
return 1;
/* Otherwise, maybe a tag object pointing to an interesting sha1 */
obj = parse_object(sha1);
if (!obj)
return 0; /* or probably we should even just die() */
if (obj->type != OBJ_TAG)
return 0;
if (sha1_array_lookup(sa, ((struct tag *)obj)->tagged->sha1) < 0)
return 0;
return 1;
}
quoted
Also, should you check "unset"? When we have options that build a list, usually doing "--no-foo" will clear the list. E.g., this: git tag --points-at=foo --points-at=bar --no-points-at --points-at=baz should look only for "baz".Ahh, so I just need to: if (unset) { if (*opt_value) free_points_at(*opt_value); *opt_value = NULL; return 0; }
Yes, exactly.
quoted
quoted
+ { + OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "points-at", &points_at, "object", + "print only annotated|signed tags of the object", + PARSE_OPT_LASTARG_DEFAULT, + parse_opt_points_at, (intptr_t)NULL, + },I think you can drop the LASTARG_DEFAULT here, as it is no longer optional, no?You mean flags = 0 instead of PARSE_OPT_LASTARG_DEFAULT, right?
Right. Though without flags, you can probably just use the OPT_CALLBACK
wrapper, like:
OPT_CALLBACK(0, "points-at", &points_at, "object",
"print only annotated|signed tags of the object",
parse_opt_points_at)
Note that if you are going to handle lightweight tags, that description
should probably be updated.
-Peff