Re: [PATCHv2] tag: add --points-at list option
From: Tom Grennan <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:01
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 11:05:27AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:01:16PM -0800, Tom Grennan wrote:quoted
+struct points_at { + struct points_at *next; + unsigned char *sha1; +};Would using sha1_array save us from having to create our own data structure? As a bonus, it can do O(lg n) lookups, though I seriously doubt anyone will provide a large number of "--points-at".
Thanks, but I now realize that I also need to save the pointed at refname to detect lightweight tags that have matching sha's but different names.
quoted
+static void free_points_at (struct points_at *points_at) +{ + while (points_at) { + struct points_at *next = points_at->next; + free(points_at->sha1); + free(points_at); + points_at = next; + } +}Then this could go away in favor of sha1_array_clear.quoted
+int parse_opt_points_at(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int unset) +{ + struct points_at *new, **opt_value = (struct points_at **)opt->value; + unsigned char *sha1; + + if (!arg) + return error(_("missing <object>")); + new = xmalloc(sizeof(struct points_at)); + sha1 = xmalloc(20); + if (get_sha1(arg, sha1)) { + free(new); + free(sha1); + return error(_("malformed object name '%s'"), arg); + } + new->sha1 = sha1; + new->next = *opt_value; + *opt_value = new; + return 0; +}And this can drop all of the memory management bits, like: unsigned char sha1[20]; if (!arg) return error(_("missing <object>")); if (get_sha1(arg, sha1)) return error(_("malformed object name '%s'"), arg); sha1_array_append(opt->value, sha1); return 0; Also, should you check "unset"? When we have options that build a list, usually doing "--no-foo" will clear the list. E.g., this: git tag --points-at=foo --points-at=bar --no-points-at --points-at=baz should look only for "baz".
Ahh, so I just need to:
if (unset) {
if (*opt_value)
free_points_at(*opt_value);
*opt_value = NULL;
return 0;
}
quoted
+static struct points_at *match_points_at(struct points_at *points_at, + const unsigned char *sha1) +{ + char *buf; + struct tag *tag; + unsigned long size; + enum object_type type; + + buf = read_sha1_file(sha1, &type, &size); + if (!buf) + return NULL; + if (type != OBJ_TAG + || (tag = lookup_tag(sha1), !tag) + || parse_tag_buffer(tag, buf, size) < 0) { + free(buf); + return NULL; + } + while (points_at && hashcmp(points_at->sha1, tag->tagged->sha1)) + points_at = points_at->next; + free(buf); + return points_at; +}Sorry, I threw a lot of object lookup code at you last time, so I think my point may have been lost in the noise. But I think this is slightly nicer as: static int tag_points_at(struct sha1_array *sa, const unsigned char *sha1) { struct object *obj = parse_object(sha1); if (!obj) return 0; /* or probably we should even just die() */ if (obj->type != OBJ_TAG) return 0; if (sha1_array_lookup(sa, ((struct tag *)obj)->tagged->sha1) < 0) return 0; return 1; } I.e., using parse_object lets you avoid dealing with memory management yourself. And as a bonus, it will reuse the cached information if you happen to have already parsed that object (not likely in typical repositories, but a huge win in certain pathological cases, like repos storing shared objects and refs for a large number of forks).
Aye
quoted
+ { + OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "points-at", &points_at, "object", + "print only annotated|signed tags of the object", + PARSE_OPT_LASTARG_DEFAULT, + parse_opt_points_at, (intptr_t)NULL, + },I think you can drop the LASTARG_DEFAULT here, as it is no longer optional, no?
You mean flags = 0 instead of PARSE_OPT_LASTARG_DEFAULT, right? Thanks, TomG