Re: [PATCH] attr: map builtin userdiff drivers to well-known extensions
From: Johannes Sixt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:39
Am 16.12.2011 20:21, schrieb Jeff King:
I'm not clear from what you wrote on whether you were saying it is simply sub-optimal, or whether on balance it is way worse than the default funcname matching.
I'm saying the latter. Okay, we're talking "only" about hunk headers. But when you are reviewing patches, they are *extremely* useful and a time-saver; when they are wrong or not present, they are exactly the opposite.
So, I'm confused. If you are using this, surely you have "*.c diff=xcpp" in your attributes file, and my patch has no effect for you,
Sure I have. What I didn't say (sorry for that!), but wanted to hint at is that this is to experiment with a pattern in order to ultimately improve the built-in pattern. The topic came up just the other day, and I took Thomas Rast's suggestion to experiment with a simplified pattern: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/186355/focus=186439 But as is, the built-in pattern misses way too many anchor points in C++ code. -- Hannes