Re: [PATCH 1/2] parse-options: introduce OPT_SUBCOMMAND

Hi,

Jonathan Nieder wrote:

Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:

quoted

, and create a new
OPT_SUBCOMMAND; this is built on top of OPTION_BIT to allow for the
detection of more than one subcommand.

This part I am not convinced about.  Usually each subcommand takes its
own options, so I cannot see this OPT_SUBCOMMAND being actually useful
for commands like "git stash" or "git remote".

Hm, what difference does that make?  We still have to parse the
subcommand, and subsequently use an if-else construct to parse more
options depending on the subcommand, no?

-- Ram