Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sequencer: working around historical mistakes

Hey,

Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:

As described in the discussion following $gmane/179304/focus=179383,
we have decided to handle historical hacks in the sequencer itself.
This series that follows is one step in the right direction.

I'm not sure what the above means.  But let's see what the patches
say. :)

[...]

2. This series depends on rr/revert-cherry-pick, but doesn't apply to
the current 'next'- sorry, rebasing is a massive pita due to 1/5.

Shouldn't it be based against rr/revert-cherry-pick, rather than
"next" which is more of a moving target?

Thanks,
Jonathan