Thread (70 messages) flat view 70 messages, 15 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: Git is not scalable with too many refs/*

From: Sverre Rabbelier <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:06

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Heya,

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 17:48, Martin Fick [off-list ref] wrote:
Hmm, I was thinking that too, and I just did a test.

Instead of storing the changes under refs/changes, I fetched
them under refs/heads/changes and then ran git 1.7.6 and it
took about 3 mins.  Then, I ran the 1.7.7.rc0.73 with
c774aab98ce6c5ef7aaacbef38da0a501eb671d4 reverted and it
only took 13s!  So, if this indeed tests what you were
suggesting, I think it shows that even in the intended case
this change slowed things down?
And if you run 1.7.7 without that commit reverted?

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help