Re: Git is not scalable with too many refs/*
From: Sverre Rabbelier <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:06
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-06-15 · Re: Git is not scalable with too many refs/* · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: Git is not scalable with too many refs/* · Michael Haggerty <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: Git is not scalable with too many refs/* · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: Git is not scalable with too many refs/* · René Scharfe <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: Git is not scalable with too many refs/* · René Scharfe <hidden>
Heya, On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 17:15, Martin Fick [off-list ref] wrote:
If this change does not actually speed things up, should it be reverted? Or was there a bug in the change that makes it not do what it was supposed to do?
It probably looks at the refs in refs/changes while it shouldn't, hence worsening your performance compared to not looking at those refs. I assume that it does improve your situation if you have all those refs under say refs/heads. -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier