Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/3] upload-archive: use start_command instead of fork

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:51:33

On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:37:48AM +0200, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
quoted
Yeah, exactly. The current code is already using dup2 in the same way.
It does, but I'm not entirely sure how dup2 works when start_async is
implemented with threads. Won't cause the multiplexer to fail (the
multiplexer and the archive-thread needs different stdouts), because
file descriptors are process-resources, and not thread-resources?
Oh, right. I'm being a moron. Sorry.
I guess I could dup stdout/stderr before dup2'ing, and have the
multiplexer write to explicitly to the duped fds. It's starting to
sound very confusing to my ears, but perhaps it's the best option
still ;)
Yes, you would have to dup stdout in the muxer to a new fd, then write
to that explicitly. And then you would be free to dup the write half of
the async pipe to stdout. It's not all that complicated, but maybe it is
simpler and more obvious (especially to a later reader of the code) to
just run a separate command.

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help