On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Jeff King wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 07:29:54PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
quoted
This is no excuse not to do proper source tree reorganization.
I think this is the crux of our disagreement. I don't agree that your
proposal is any way more "proper" than what is there now. Leaving the
rename issue aside (i.e., if we were starting a new project), I would
still be slightly against a src/ directory. I find them annoying.
Let's agree to disagree then. What I see in the root of the Git source
tree is a huge clutter of source files, binary files, scripts, and
subdirectories all mixed together. If you know by hart where things are
because you've been hacking on them for the last 5 years then of course
you might not see the point. But since I didn't work much on Git
lately, things are not as obvious to me as they used to be. Looking
back at it now with some distance, this tree looks like a mess and it is
really annoying to work with.
But I don't care _that_ much, and I would rather not waste either of our
time debating it more. I would much rather you spend your time on
pack v4. :)
I wish... I wish. But I have a plan which might involve taking some
vacation from $day_job in the Caribbeans with $wife and no kids, where
$wife is going to do scuba diving with her club mates while I'll be
alone with a laptop and no net connection and therefore nothing else to
do for a week. I've been craving for such free time for quite a while
now.
Nicolas