Re: [PATCH 01/10] Better "Changed but not updated" message in git-status
From: Jakub Narebski <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:49:51
Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:
Matthieu Moy wrote:quoted
--- a/Documentation/gittutorial-2.txt +++ b/Documentation/gittutorial-2.txt@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ $ git status # # new file: closing.txt # -# Changed but not updated: +# Changed but not staged for commit: # (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)I find this even more confusing, though I admit that may be due to habit more than anything else.
Perhaps
# Changed but changes not staged for commit:
My reading, before: These files were changed, but the version to be committed has not been updated to include the latest changes (use "git add <file>..." to add these changes to the index). Afterwards: These files were changed, but they are not staged for the next commit. If I do echo hello >hi.c git add hi.c echo world >>hi.c git status then what does it mean to say "hi.c" is not staged for commit? It actually does have changes ready for committing. I would prefer to say something to the effect of # Has unstaged changes: Anyone wordsmiths out there with ideas to make this clearer?
But this might be a better solution. -- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git