Matthieu Moy wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/Documentation/glossary-content.txt
+++ b/Documentation/glossary-content.txt
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ to point at the new commit.
you have. In such these cases, you do not make a new <<def_merge,merge>>
<<def_commit,commit>> but instead just update to his
revision. This will happen frequently on a
- <<def_tracking_branch,tracking branch>> of a remote
+ <<def_remote_tracking_branch,remote-tracking branch>> of a remote
<<def_repository,repository>>.
Why not keep the anchor name, like so:
<<def_tracking_branch,remote-tracking branch>>
(for brevity and to keep old links valid)?