Re: [PATCH] hash: Remove useless init_hash()
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:49:12
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 19:49, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:36:09AM +0000, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
-static inline void init_hash(struct hash_table *table) -{ - table->size = 0; - table->nr = 0; - table->array = NULL; -}*This* could be replaced by memset.No it couldn't? The second argument to memset is just an int, so setting the memory area to 0 isn't portable to systems where the representation of NULL isn't "0". (It's early so I may be misremembering my C..)You're remembering your C correctly. It isn't portable, but it is so unlikely on modern machines that we simply don't care (and you will see memsets zero-ing pointers like this all through the git code, so this is certainly not introducing anything new).
Thanks for the confirmation. I was aware that NULL != 0 only occured on long-dead architechtures, but I suspected that some compiler out there would whine if it could statically determine that you were reading in a memzero'd area and using it as NULL. Evidently not, or at least nobody's complained.
That being said, I agree with the comments that removing init_hash actually makes the code _less_ readable. You could just replace these three lines with a memset, but why? It's just code churn.
Yeah, and for the record it also missed this part in hash.c:
void free_hash(struct hash_table *table)
{
free(table->array);
table->array = NULL;
table->size = 0;
table->nr = 0;
}
Have fun everyone :)